{"id":39474,"date":"2023-11-08T19:26:46","date_gmt":"2023-11-08T16:26:46","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.turkishpost.net\/ar\/?p=39474"},"modified":"2023-11-08T19:26:46","modified_gmt":"2023-11-08T16:26:46","slug":"yargida-can-atalay-kavgasi-aym-kararini-tanimayan-yargitay-suc-duyurusunda-bulundu","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.turkishpost.net\/ar\/yargida-can-atalay-kavgasi-aym-kararini-tanimayan-yargitay-suc-duyurusunda-bulundu\/","title":{"rendered":"Yarg\u0131da Can Atalay kavgas\u0131: AYM karar\u0131n\u0131 tan\u0131mayan Yarg\u0131tay, su\u00e7 duyurusunda bulundu"},"content":{"rendered":"

(The Turkish Post) \u2013 <\/strong>En y\u00fcksek yarg\u0131 organ\u0131 olan ve kararlar\u0131n\u0131n ba\u011flay\u0131c\u0131 olmas\u0131 gereken Anayasa Mahkemesi\u2019nin (AYM) 14 May\u0131s genel se\u00e7imlerinde T\u0130P\u2019ten Hatay Milletvekili se\u00e7ilen Can Atalay\u2019\u0131n tahliye edilmesi y\u00f6n\u00fcnde verdi\u011fi karar, Yarg\u0131tay taraf\u0131ndan tan\u0131nmad\u0131. Anayasa Mahkemesi\u2019nin Anayasa\u2019y\u0131 ihlal etti\u011fini ve yetkisini a\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 savunan Yarg\u0131tay 3. Ceza Dairesi, Atalay hakk\u0131nda ihlal karar\u0131 veren Anayasa Mahkemesi \u00fcyeleri hakk\u0131nda da su\u00e7 duyurusunda bulundu. 3. Ceza Dairesi, AYM’nin Can Atalay’\u0131n tahliye edilmesi y\u00f6n\u00fcndeki karar\u0131n\u0131 da reddetti.<\/p>\n

Gezi davas\u0131ndan mahkum olduktan sonra milletvekili se\u00e7ilen ve Anayasa Mahkemesi’nin hakk\u0131nda ihlal karar\u0131 verdi\u011fi Avukat Can Atalay’\u0131n dosyas\u0131 Anayasa Mahkemesi taraf\u0131ndan yerel mahkeme olan \u0130stanbul 13. Ceza Mahkemesi’ne g\u00f6nderilmi\u015fti.<\/p>\n

Mahkeme, dosyada karar verme yetkisinin Yarg\u0131tay 3. Ceza Dairesi’nde oldu\u011funu belirterek dosyay\u0131 ge\u00e7ti\u011fimiz g\u00fcnlerde bu daireye g\u00f6nderdi.<\/p>\n

Dosyay\u0131 inceleyen Yarg\u0131tay 3. Ceza Dairesi, \u00f6nceki karar\u0131n\u0131n do\u011fru oldu\u011funu belirterek Anayasa Mahkemesi’nin ihlal karar\u0131na uyulmamas\u0131na h\u00fckmetti ve Can Atalay’\u0131n mahkumiyet karar\u0131n\u0131 onad\u0131.<\/p>\n

SU\u00c7 DUYURUSUNDA BULUNDU<\/strong><\/p>\n

Atalay\u2019\u0131n milletvekilli\u011finin de d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcr\u00fclmesi i\u00e7in TBMM\u2019ye bildirimde bulunan Yarg\u0131tay 3. Ceza Dairesi, bir ilke de imza att\u0131. Anayasa Mahkemesi\u2019nin Anayasa\u2019y\u0131 ihlal etti\u011fini ve yetkisini a\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirten Yarg\u0131tay 3. Ceza Dairesi Atalay hakk\u0131nda ihlal karar\u0131 veren Anayasa Mahkemesi \u00fcyeleri hakk\u0131nda da su\u00e7 duyurusunda bulundu.<\/p>\n

Dosya hakk\u0131ndaki talepleri de\u011ferlendiren Yarg\u0131tay 3. Ceza Dairesi, Can Atalay hakk\u0131nda verilen ihlal karar\u0131nda Anayasa Mahkemesi’nin, Daire’nin infaz\u0131 kabil ve kesinle\u015fmi\u015f karar\u0131n\u0131 dikkate almaks\u0131z\u0131n inceleme yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131na dikkat \u00e7ekildi.<\/p>\n

Dairenin karar\u0131nda \u015fu ifadeler kullan\u0131ld\u0131:<\/p>\n

‘AYM’N\u0130N \u0130NCELEME YETK\u0130S\u0130 YOK’<\/strong><\/p>\n

“Hakk\u0131ndaki kesin h\u00fck\u00fcm TBMM’ye bildirildi\u011finde, bu husus Genel Kurul’a sunulmak suretiyle milletvekilli\u011finin derhal d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcr\u00fclmesine dair karar verilmi\u015f olmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi halde, her ne kadar s\u00fcre\u00e7 i\u00e7erisinde TBMM taraf\u0131ndan bu hususta bir karar verilememi\u015f olsa da bu konuyu d\u00fczenleyen Anayasa’n\u0131n 84\/2 maddesi a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan Anayasa Mahkemesi’ne m\u00fcracaat imkan\u0131 tan\u0131nmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gibi Anayasa Mahkemesi’nin bu konuda da inceleme yetkisi bulunmamaktad\u0131r<\/p>\n

‘BA\u015e\u00d6RT\u00dcS\u00dc YASA\u011eI GEREK\u00c7ES\u0130 \u0130RON\u0130 OLARAK DE\u011eERLEND\u0130R\u0130LM\u0130\u015eT\u0130R’<\/strong><\/p>\n

Ayr\u0131ca, Anayasa Mahkemesi, \u015eerafettin Can Atalay hakk\u0131nda vermi\u015f oldu\u011fu hak ihlali karar\u0131nda, \u00f6nceki \u00d6mer Faruk Gergerlio\u011flu ve Leyla G\u00fcven kararlar\u0131ndan farkl\u0131 olarak milletvekili dokunulmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden Anayasa’n\u0131n 14. maddesinin hangi su\u00e7lar\u0131 kapsad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n anayasal ya da yasal d\u00fczenleme d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda yarg\u0131sal bir yorumla belirlenmesinin ciddi s\u0131k\u0131nt\u0131lara yol a\u00e7aca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirtirken, kendisinin daha \u00f6nceden yarg\u0131sal aktivizm sonucu vermi\u015f oldu\u011fu ve kamuoyunda \u00fcniversitelere ba\u015f\u00f6rt\u00fc yasa\u011f\u0131 olarak bilinen, bizce de kabul g\u00f6rmeyen bir karar\u0131n\u0131 gerek\u00e7e g\u00f6stermesi taraf\u0131m\u0131zdan dikkat \u00e7ekici bulunmu\u015f ve bir ironi olarak de\u011ferlendirilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

AYM’YE ‘RAHATLIK’ SU\u00c7LAMASI<\/strong><\/p>\n

Karar\u0131nda, yarg\u0131 organlar\u0131n\u0131n Anayasa’n\u0131n 14. maddesine hangi su\u00e7lar\u0131n girece\u011fini yorumlamalar\u0131n\u0131n sa\u011fl\u0131kl\u0131 olmayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131, mutlaka anayasal ya da yasal d\u00fczenleme yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n gerekti\u011fini s\u00f6yleyen Anayasa Mahkemesi, bug\u00fcne kadar hem norm denetimi kararlar\u0131nda (mesela y\u00fcr\u00fctmeyi durdurma karar\u0131 vermesi ya da h\u00fckm\u00fcn a\u00e7\u0131klanmas\u0131n\u0131n geri b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131 kurumunun do\u011fru uygulanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan bahisle iptali vb.) hem de sonradan kendisine tali g\u00f6rev olarak verilen bireysel ba\u015fvuru kararlar\u0131nda, anayasal veya yasal bir yetkisi olmamas\u0131na ra\u011fmen hi\u00e7bir organ taraf\u0131ndan denetlenmememin vermi\u015f oldu\u011fu rahatl\u0131kla da, i\u00e7tihat yoluyla anayasal yetkisini s\u00fcrekli art\u0131rmak ve k\u00f6t\u00fcye kullanmak suretiyle kendisinin, daha \u00f6nceden norm denetimi g\u00f6revi s\u0131ras\u0131nda s\u0131k\u00e7a dile getirilen yasama organ\u0131 \u00fczerinde vesayet organ\u0131 oldu\u011funa y\u00f6nelik ele\u015ftirilerin, bireysel ba\u015fvuruya ili\u015fkin yetkinin verilmesi \u00fczerine y\u00fcksek mahkemeler dahil t\u00fcm yarg\u0131 \u00fczerinde de ortaya \u00e7\u0131kmas\u0131na neden olmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n

‘AYM, DA\u0130REM\u0130Z \u00dcYELER\u0130N\u0130 TEHD\u0130T ETT\u0130’<\/strong><\/p>\n

Hatta gelinen noktada Anayasa Mahkemesi, h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc \u015eerafettin Can Atalay’a y\u00f6nelik vermi\u015f oldu\u011fu ihlal karar\u0131nda, yasal bir dayana\u011f\u0131 olmamas\u0131na ve doktrinde bile tart\u0131\u015fmal\u0131 bir konu olmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen, “Anayasa Mahkemesi kararlar\u0131n\u0131n objektif i\u015flevinden” bahsederek, karar\u0131 veren Yarg\u0131tay 3. Ceza Dairesi \u00fcyelerini ”ihmal su\u00e7unu i\u015flemi\u015flerdir” \u015feklinde tehdit etme boyutuna kadar i\u015fi vard\u0131rm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bug\u00fcne kadar bir\u00e7ok ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc veya \u00fcyesi taraf\u0131ndan hem sosyal medya hem de yaz\u0131l\u0131 ve g\u00f6rsel bas\u0131n \u00fczerinden ya da ilk derece yarg\u0131lamalar\u0131 veya temyiz incelemesi s\u0131ras\u0131nda g\u00f6nderilen dilek\u00e7elerle s\u00fcrekli tehdit edilen Dairemiz \u00fcyelerinin, bir de Anayasa Mahkemesi taraf\u0131ndan bu \u015fekilde tehdit edilmesi de esef verici ve manidar bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n

‘AYM VESAYET MAKAMI G\u0130B\u0130 DAVRANMAKTADIR’<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u00dclkemizde Anayasa Mahkemesi sadece yasalar\u0131 iptal ederek yasama organ\u0131n\u0131n alan\u0131na m\u00fcdahale etmemekte; ayr\u0131ca, bazen yasa koyucu gibi davranarak Anayasa’ya g\u00f6re aralar\u0131nda astl\u0131k \u00fcstl\u00fck ili\u015fkisi bulunmayan y\u00fcksek mahkemeler \u00fczerinde de s\u00fcper temyiz mahkemesi olarak vesayet makam\u0131 gibi davranmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n

YARGITAY 3. CEZA DA\u0130RE’N\u0130N OY B\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLE ALDI\u011eI KARARLAR<\/strong><\/p>\n

Metnin sonunda ‘Gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc’ denilerek \u015fu kararlara yer verildi:<\/p>\n

1-Yukar\u0131da a\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle; Anayasa Mahkemesi’nin 2023\/53898 numaral\u0131, \u015eerafettin Can Atalay’\u0131n bireysel ba\u015fvurusu hakk\u0131nda 25.10.2023 tarihli ihlal karar\u0131na hukuki de\u011fer ve ge\u00e7erlilik izafi edilemeyece\u011fi cihetle, bu ba\u011flamda Anayasa’n\u0131n 153. maddesi kapsam\u0131nda uygulanmas\u0131 gereken bir karar bulunmamakla; keza \u015eerafettin Can Atalay hakk\u0131nda verilen mahkumiyet karar\u0131n\u0131n temyizi \u00fczerine yap\u0131lan temyiz incelemesi sonucu 28.09.2023 tarihinde Dairemizin 2023\/12611 esas 2023\/6359 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 ile onanarak kesinle\u015fen ve infaz\u0131 kabil bir h\u00fckm\u00fcn mevcudiyeti kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda; Anayasa Mahkemesi’nin an\u0131lan karar\u0131na UYULMAMASINA,<\/p>\n

2-\u015eerafettin Can Atalay hakk\u0131ndaki mahkumiyet h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn 28.09.2023 tarihinde Dairemiz taraf\u0131ndan onanmas\u0131 ile h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc s\u0131fat\u0131n\u0131 kazand\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve Anayasa’n\u0131n 84\/2. maddesinde milletvekilli\u011finin d\u00fc\u015fmesi sebeplerinden biri olarak ”kesin h\u00fck\u00fcm giyme veya k\u0131s\u0131tlanma halinin” d\u00fczenlenmi\u015f oldu\u011fu, Anayasa’n\u0131n 76. maddesinde say\u0131lan milletvekilli\u011fi ile ba\u011fda\u015fmayan su\u00e7lardan kurulan mahkumiyet h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn milletvekilli\u011fini d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcrece\u011fi, Anayasa’n\u0131n 84\/2 maddesi y\u00f6n\u00fcnden Anayasa Mahkemesi’ne m\u00fcracaat imkan\u0131 tan\u0131nmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve Anayasa Mahkemesi’nin bu konuda inceleme yetkisinin de bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6zetilerek; h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc \u015eerafettin Can Atalay’\u0131n milletvekilli\u011finin d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcr\u00fclmesine y\u00f6nelik i\u015flemlere ba\u015flanmas\u0131 i\u00e7in karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin TBMM Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131’na G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n

3-Anayasa h\u00fck\u00fcmlerini ihlal eden ve kendisine verilen yetki s\u0131n\u0131rlar\u0131n\u0131 yasal olmayacak \u015fekilde a\u015farak hak ihlalinin kabul\u00fc y\u00f6n\u00fcnde oy kullanan ilgili Anayasa Mahkemesi \u00fcyeleri hakk\u0131nda gere\u011finin takdir ve ifas\u0131 i\u00e7in Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131’na su\u00e7 duyurusunda BULUNULMASINA, Dosya \u00fczerinden yap\u0131lan inceleme neticesinde m\u00fctalaaya uygun olarak, dosyan\u0131n \u0130stanbul 13. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi’ne g\u00f6nderilmek \u00fczere Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131’na TEVD\u0130\u0130NE, 08.11.2023 tarihinde oy birli\u011fi ile karar verildi.<\/p>\n

Karar\u0131n alt\u0131nda imzas\u0131 olan hakimler: Ba\u015fkan; Muhsin \u015eent\u00fcrk, \u00fcyeler; Hakan Y\u00fcksel Mustafa Do\u011fru \u015eerafettin Saka Mustafa Karay\u0131ld\u0131z.<\/p>\n

BAH\u00c7EL\u0130 ‘YEN\u0130DEN YAPILANDIRILMASI GEREKL\u0130’ DEM\u0130\u015eT\u0130<\/strong><\/p>\n

Karar\u0131n ard\u0131ndan MHP Genel Ba\u015fkan\u0131 Devlet Bah\u00e7eli’nin 29 Nisan’da K\u00fctahya’da yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 konu\u015fma g\u00fcndem oldu. Bah\u00e7eli konu\u015fmas\u0131nda “Anayasa Mahkemesinin yeniden yap\u0131land\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 gerekli g\u00f6r\u00fcyoruz. Bu kapsamda mahkemenin stat\u00fcs\u00fc, kurulu\u015f ve yarg\u0131lama esaslar\u0131 ile \u00fcye yap\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n k\u00f6kl\u00fc bir reforma tabi tutulmas\u0131n\u0131 hedefliyoruz” demi\u015fti.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

(The Turkish Post) \u2013 En y\u00fcksek yarg\u0131 organ\u0131 olan ve kararlar\u0131n\u0131n ba\u011flay\u0131c\u0131 olmas\u0131 gereken Anayasa Mahkemesi\u2019nin (AYM) 14 May\u0131s genel se\u00e7imlerinde T\u0130P\u2019ten Hatay Milletvekili se\u00e7ilen Can Atalay\u2019\u0131n tahliye edilmesi y\u00f6n\u00fcnde verdi\u011fi karar, Yarg\u0131tay taraf\u0131ndan tan\u0131nmad\u0131. Anayasa Mahkemesi\u2019nin Anayasa\u2019y\u0131 ihlal etti\u011fini ve yetkisini a\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 savunan Yarg\u0131tay 3. Ceza Dairesi, Atalay hakk\u0131nda ihlal karar\u0131 veren Anayasa Mahkemesi […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":39475,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"jnews-multi-image_gallery":[],"jnews_single_post":{"source_name":"","source_url":"","via_name":"","via_url":"","override_template":"0","override":[{"template":"1","single_blog_custom":"","parallax":"1","fullscreen":"1","layout":"right-sidebar","sidebar":"default-sidebar","second_sidebar":"default-sidebar","sticky_sidebar":"1","share_position":"topbottom","share_float_style":"share-monocrhome","show_share_counter":"0","show_view_counter":"0","show_featured":"1","show_post_meta":"1","show_post_author":"0","show_post_author_image":"1","show_post_date":"1","post_date_format":"default","post_date_format_custom":"Y\/m\/d","show_post_category":"0","show_post_reading_time":"1","post_reading_time_wpm":"300","show_zoom_button":"1","zoom_button_out_step":"4","zoom_button_in_step":"4","show_post_tag":"1","show_prev_next_post":"0","show_popup_post":"1","number_popup_post":"2","show_author_box":"1","show_post_related":"1","show_inline_post_related":"0"}],"override_image_size":"0","image_override":[{"single_post_thumbnail_size":"crop-715","single_post_gallery_size":"crop-500"}],"trending_post":"0","trending_post_position":"meta","trending_post_label":"Trending","sponsored_post":"0","sponsored_post_label":"Sponsored by","sponsored_post_name":"","sponsored_post_url":"","sponsored_post_logo_enable":"0","sponsored_post_logo":"","sponsored_post_desc":"","disable_ad":"0"},"jnews_primary_category":{"id":"4","hide":""},"jnews_override_bookmark_settings":{"override_bookmark_button":"0","override_show_bookmark_button":"0"},"jnews_social_meta":{"fb_title":"","fb_description":"","fb_image":"","twitter_title":"","twitter_description":"","twitter_image":""},"jnews_override_counter":{"override_view_counter":"0","view_counter_number":"0","override_share_counter":"0","share_counter_number":"0","override_like_counter":"0","like_counter_number":"0","override_dislike_counter":"0","dislike_counter_number":"0"},"footnotes":""},"categories":[4,1],"tags":[717,3190,1422,1495],"class_list":["post-39474","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-gundem","category-son-haberler","tag-anayasa-mahkemesi","tag-can-atalay","tag-slider-manset","tag-yargitay"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.turkishpost.net\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/39474","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.turkishpost.net\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.turkishpost.net\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.turkishpost.net\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.turkishpost.net\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=39474"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.turkishpost.net\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/39474\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.turkishpost.net\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/39475"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.turkishpost.net\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=39474"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.turkishpost.net\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=39474"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.turkishpost.net\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=39474"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}